Des bracelets électroniques pourraient transmettre en temps réel si un individu a été vacciné.
Source : http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/11/21/boston_launches_flu_shot_tracking/

The Boston Globe
Boston launches flu shot tracking
City to pinpoint areas of low rates of vaccination
By Stephen Smith
Globe Staff / November 21, 2008

Using technology originally developed for mass disasters, Boston disease trackers are embarking on a novel experiment - one of the first in the country - aimed at eventually creating a citywide registry of everyone who has had a flu vaccination.

The resulting vaccination map would allow swift intervention in neighborhoods left vulnerable to the fast-moving respiratory illness.

The trial starts this afternoon, when several hundred people are expected to queue up for immunizations at the headquarters of the Boston Public Health Commission. Each of them will get a bracelet printed with a unique identifier code. Information about the vaccine's recipients, and the shot, will be entered into handheld devices similar to those used by delivery truck drivers.

Lire l'article original

Un article de la Presse Canadienne parue dans le Devoir rapporte que le gouvernement Canadien n'a toujours pas statué si les compagnies pharmaceutiques disposeront d'une immunité contre les poursuites découlant de problèmes de santé suite aux vaccinations contre la grippe A.

Source : http://www.ledevoir.com/2009/09/21/267924.html

La Presse canadienne

Ottawa -- Le gouvernement fédéral refuse de dire si les Canadiens qui souffriront de graves effets secondaires liés au nouveau vaccin contre la grippe A(H1N1) pourront intenter des poursuites contre le producteur du vaccin.

L'Agence de la santé publique du Canada n'a pas voulu indiquer si les sociétés pharmaceutiques seraient protégées au pays contre toute poursuite au sujet du vaccin contre la grippe A(H1N1) , comme le sont celles faisant affaire aux États-Unis.

Dans un courriel, la porte-parole Nadia Mostafa a écrit qu'il s'agissait d'une situation complexe que le gouvernement fédéral examinait actuellement. Mme Mostafa a expliqué que le sujet suscitait des questions d'ordre légal touchant les champs de compétence fédéral et provincial de même que les secteurs public et privé. Puis, elle a ajouté que le gouvernement fournirait davantage de détails en temps appropriés, soit au terme de discussions.

Lire la suite »

Notez bien qu'on parle ici d'ordre de mise en quarantaine, d'hospitalisation, de confinement et même d'emprisonnement pour ceux qui ne seraient pas 'collaboratif', et ce malgré tous les doutes qui persistent sur les traitement ou le vaccin.

Source : http://www.prisonplanet.com/list-of-usa-states-which-have-implemented-legal-actions-in-response-to-the-h1n1-virus.html

FightBackH1N1
Wednesday, Sept 23rd, 2009

New York : According to the CDC, the following states have implemented legal actions in response to the H1N1 virus:

Florida – the Florida surgeon general suspended distribution permit requirements Florida statutes to allow wholesale distribution of Tamiflu and Relenza. The state has also distributed a series of blank quarantine order forms, including a voluntary home quarantine agreement, a quarantine to residence order, a quarantine to residence order (non-compliance), a quarantine to facility order, quarantine detention order, quarantine of facility order, building quarantine closure order and area quarantine closure order.

Iowa – In addition to the facility quarantine order listed above, Iowa has also made available forms for voluntary home confinement, home quarantine and home isolation.

Massachusetts – Massachusetts lists its own procedures for isolation and quarantine.

North Carolina – The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services released a draft isolation order that would provide for imprisonment for up to two years and pretrial detention without bail for any citizen who fails to comply with an isolation order.

Washington – Washington grants authority to local health officers to issue emergency detention orders causing citizens to be immediately and involuntarily isolated or quarantined for up to 10 days.

In addition, governors and health commissioners in the following states have declared a state of emergency since April following concerns about the H1N1 virus: California, Florida, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin.

Clearly this has nothing to do with public health and the qualitative ethical practice of medicine. What about all the people who already had swine flu? Those people, who have already built natural immunity, if forced to quarantine in close quarters with a bunch of other people who may have other types of infectious diseases such as seasonal flu, etc., then become exposed to other infectious diseases and are at greater health risk. This seems like a great plan to help SPREAD whatever disease(s) they want to spread!